| ▲ | tgsovlerkhgsel a day ago |
| OTOH, beware letting yourself be intimidated by scary looking but unenforcable clauses that are all over contracts. In doubt, spend a bit of money on a lawyer to figure out what your real situation is. I know of several cases where lawyers said "don't bother arguing with them about clause X, just sign it and ignore it". |
|
| ▲ | BobbyTables2 20 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| I suspect our primary school upbringing of “follow the rules” holds a lot of people back. Seems like a lot of successful people in business know exactly how far they can step over the line without suffering serious consequences. |
| |
| ▲ | thfuran 17 hours ago | parent [-] | | Societies where no one has any regard for rules aren't great either. | | |
| ▲ | inetknght 17 hours ago | parent [-] | | You can't make billions of dollars by following rules... | | |
| ▲ | teaearlgraycold 24 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | Ideally less people would be attaining that kind of personal wealth. Companies should be scaled back as well IMO. | |
| ▲ | epicureanideal 15 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Society would be better if we could, and we would all benefit. Looking at what the growth trajectories are of countries with high corruption, it’s not great, so our growth is probably still reduced by the corruption or lawlessness that still exists. | | |
| ▲ | thfuran 15 hours ago | parent [-] | | Why do you think having billionaires at all is of benefit to society? Or do you just mean that the people inclined to break rules to accumulate unreasonable wealth would just follow them instead if that worked as well and that is what would benefit society? | | |
| ▲ | epicureanideal 14 hours ago | parent [-] | | Because in a well organized society where wealth accumulation is not by corruption, then by definition it would be by creating value, which benefits everyone. The alternative is something like oligarchs that extract wealth because of state granted monopolies, corporatism that strangles competition with anti competitive regulation, etc. The accumulation of wealth is all out of proportion and possibly not even correlated in those cases with the production of actual value. | | |
|
| |
| ▲ | 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [deleted] |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | voidfunc 20 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| This is pretty much the advice every lawyer has given me in the past. The likelihood of it coming up is very low. Sometimes it's good to not be special. |
| |
| ▲ | ghaff 20 hours ago | parent [-] | | The one time I had to sign a non-compete--because my company was acquired--I just signed it because it was quite specific and I wasn't going to be an exec of a storage company anytime soon. Probably didn't matter much because I left a few months later anyway. |
|
|
| ▲ | dimitry12 19 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| What are the keywords for finding a lawyer who can advise on non-competes? Asking because it turned out nearly impossible to find a local lawyer to advise on a dispute couple months ago - with 9 out of 10 telling me they only do divorces or real estate or immigration. I was literally calling one by one from a list based on what I believe were relevant search criteria on State Bar website. |
| |
|
| ▲ | PaulHoule 19 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| I had a non-compete cause in a contract, I wound up in a dispute over unemployment insurance and the contract came up, the judge told me that the non-complete cause didn't make any sense at all but that's because it was poorly written. |
