I'm not sure what conclusions you think we should draw from that. California's advantage over Washington is primarily one of size - Washington's GDP per capita is actually about 3% higher than California's. The most generous interpretation I can think of is that you're crediting the non-compete difference for California's far larger population, which is tenuous at best.

▲

kirubakaran a day ago | parent [-]

Shockley -> Fairchild -> Intel, AMD couldn't have happened with non-compete. So Silicon Valley couldn't have happened in Washington.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traitorous_eight

Per capita isn't a good measure here, as Washington's weather helps lower the denominator (I say this as a former Seattle resident)

▲

Der_Einzige 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Seattles weather does nothing to lower the denominator. The PNW is rainy and somewhat cold, but not cold enough to kill homeless on the street in large numbers which is what folks seem to think lowers the denominator. And yes I do live in the PNW.

	▲	dehugger an hour ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Eastern Washington is what lowers the denominator. Source: grew up there.
	▲	3 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		[deleted]

▲

airocker 17 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I can bet they happened with NDAs. Noncompete is another story, that is not the OPs problem here.