▲ | llm_nerd a day ago | |||||||
I'm pro-California and anti-noncompetes, but I'm not sure if this evidence demonstrates much. The banning of non-competes in California is a very recent thing, and if we're doing a correlation thing, California saw the vast bulk of its growth when non-competes were in effect. | ||||||||
▲ | loaph a day ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
It’s not a recent thing. Search for 1872 here, https://www.purduegloballawschool.edu/blog/news/california-n... Some form of a ban on noncompete enforcement in CA has existed since then. It has long been codified in CA business code 16600, https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySectio... | ||||||||
▲ | haxton a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
California has banned non competes since 1872. You might be thinking about non solicits which was 2024 also reaffirming the ban on non competes | ||||||||
▲ | karthikb 21 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
The Traitorous Eight would only have been possible in California, not Washington, because of the position on noncompetes. | ||||||||
|