▲ | poisonborz a day ago | ||||||||||||||||
Why? What is the reason root would be dangerous, if it's not the default? People can be scammed to activate it, but those same people can be scammed to click links and give passwords and personal data. Any action requiring root would need a warning and raise suspicion, or put behind an activation mechanism that's complex enough. Anything else and you lose freedom, and the whole ethos that enabled the advanced IT landscape of today. | |||||||||||||||||
▲ | smokel a day ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Having root access implies that you can do all sorts of things: change files, install new software, new kernel modules, etc. Locking this down makes the attack surface for malicious parties much smaller. Many exploits start in user-space and then obtain root access to install rootkits. Of course you lose freedom, but that is exactly what is needed, because some people just cannot help themselves from exploiting that freedom. Unless someone figures out a way where we can safely share computing power and connections to real-life services (e.g. banking, having an identity, communication in general), I think there is no real alternative. Perhaps having separate internets for various purposes would be an option. Ond where we can socialize anonymously, but not trust each other, and one where it's pretty boring, but where you can safely buy goods using your paycheck. | |||||||||||||||||
|