▲ | mervz 2 days ago | |
This is such a weird thing to say and I see it all of the time. It sucks people have been tricked into thinking a library must be updated every 2 weeks in order to still be relevant. You think just because an author bumps the version number of a library it's somehow better than a library that is considered complete? It boggles my mind that people actually think this way. | ||
▲ | sodapopcan a day ago | parent [-] | |
You must never have been a Ruby developer. “I notice this library hasn’t been updated in 8 days, is it still being maintained?” |