As a long time Hatchet user, I understand why you’ve created this library, but it also disappoints me a little bit. I wish more engineering time was spent on making the core platform more stable and performant.

Definitely understand the frustration, the difficulty of Hatchet being general-purpose is that being performant for every use-case can be tricky, particularly when combining many features (concurrency, rate limiting, priority queueing, retries with backoff, etc). We should be more transparent about which combinations of use-cases we're focused on optimizing.

We spent a long time optimizing the single-task FIFO use-case, which is what we typically benchmark against. Performance for that pattern is i/o-bound at > 10k/s which is a good sign (just need better disks). So a pure durable-execution workload should run very performantly.

We're focused on improving multi-task and concurrency use-cases now. Our benchmarking setup recently added support for those patterns. More on this soon!