[flagged]

I don't really care if "AI assistance" was used as long a human is actually reviewing the output, which just doesn't seem to be the case here (and usually not the case when it comes to "vibe coding")

▲

eknkc 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I feel fine if AI was used to add features to an established software. Let it loose on the linux kernel for what I care. It still somehow feels icky to use it to build something from scratch.

	▲	elashri 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		Ironically it wouldn't be very useful for Linux kernel development (would be very hard to out it in context) while it is more suitable for new projects written from scratch. This of course not considering the quality or anything else.

▲

Bender 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Somewhat off topic question but I ask this from time to time and maybe now is that time. Has AI started fixing everyone's software bugs and closing out all the CVE's yet?

▲

un1970ix 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

No one is against using AI or coding with agents unless you don't understand what it's doing and you're incapable of reviewing the output. The problem isn't the tool, it's "coders" who unthinkingly trust it without verification.