| |
| ▲ | Rapzid 4 days ago | parent [-] | | 5x5 and 3x5 are out of vogue for lots of reasons but it largely boils down to: * Not enough volume * Non-periodized That first bit means different things at different phases of a lifting "career". But generally speaking "time under tension" and research into effective rep ranges has changed modern thinking on set sizes and volume. These days people, including World's Strongest Men, tend to recommend higher rep ranges for beginners and those coming back to the gym to build work capacity and reduce risk of injury. | | |
| ▲ | SoftTalker 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | | If you are just starting out all that matters is going in to the gym regularly and lifting some weight. 3x5, 5x5, or some complicated periodized program with a lot of accessories are all going to work. That's why I recommend keeping it simple. Build the habit and build some strength. Once you've done that, you can get fancy if you find that you're really into it. | | |
| ▲ | bluGill 3 days ago | parent [-] | | A better training plan gives you a chance of winning competition. Most of us wouldn't win no matter what plan we follow (at my age only drugs could make me a winner and those have side effects I don't want), we just want enough strength for general life and health. With those more modest goals 3x5, 5x5, or since something not as good still will get us there. What are your goals? |
| |
| ▲ | nsagent 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Weird. I've lifted on and off for 25 years. For most of that time I did the stereotypical 3x8-12 and saw much slower progression. During the past couple years I switched to a 5x5 plan and saw massive gains in strength, even while I was cutting weight via a caloric deficit (was eating 1500-1600 calories a day, but had lots of protein and adequate carbs). For reference, I went from a dumbbell bench press of 45lb to 75lb in 4.5 months (5x5). Previously my progress was much slower. I'll caveat that I've obviously not closely controlled for all factors and I'm an n of 1. Additionally my interest is in having a great strength to weight ratio, rather than being a body builder. I'm a climber and that's an important consideration. | | |
| ▲ | Rapzid 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | | It's not that weird; Stronglifts (SL aka 5x5) and Starting Strength (SS aka 3x5) both utilize progressive overload to stimulate gains. Progressive overload works. Those programs "work". They are just out of vogue for beginners, and they are both targeted towards beginners. | | |
| ▲ | RankingMember 2 days ago | parent [-] | | Out of vogue for beginners according to what/who? This is the first I'm hearing of a falloff of 3x5/5x5 for beginners, so I'm confused where this is coming from. |
| |
| ▲ | dankwizard 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | I'm sorry but what? You have been lifting weights somewhat regularly for 25 years, majority 3x8-12, and the switch to 5x5 increased your dumb bell bench press from ~20kg to ~35kg? There is just no way. That is extremely light weight. Like, most beginners who follow any sort of progressive overloading system will be at that level in 4 weeks starting from essentially 0 | | |
| ▲ | surgomat 2 days ago | parent [-] | | Just jumping in here to feed my ego :D after 15 years of lifting, I'm currently pushing 4x10 with 50kg dumbbells on the bench.
So yeah, 35kg after 25 years seems odd unless those 25 years weren't exactly "serious" or "consistent" let's say. No judgment, but yeah |
|
| |
| ▲ | mmmrk 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | 3x5 like done by Starting Strength continues to work well for beginners looking for strength. After you tapped out the easy gains, you can use a periodized program for body building described by "the science" if you wish, but can do more useful weights because you are stronger. |
|
|
