▲ | paul_h a day ago | |
Copilot suggests:
I don't know why it's suggesting `neilpang` though, as he no longer has a fork. | ||
▲ | lucideer a day ago | parent [-] | |
Yeah I'm not running anything llms spit at me in a security-sensitive context. That example is not so bad - you've already pointed out the main obvious supply-chain attack vector in referencing a random ephemeral fork, but otherwise it's certonly (presumably neil's default) so it's the simplest case. Many clients have more... intrusive defaults that prioritise first-run cert onboarding which is opening more surface area for write error. |