▲ | bigstrat2003 2 days ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
There's no good reason to serve a blog over TLS. You're not handling sensitive data, so unencrypted is just fine. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | foobiekr 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
The reason is to prevent your site from becoming a watering hole where malicious actors use it to inject malware into the browsers of your users. TLS isn't for you, it's for your readers. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | cAtte_ 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
relevant blog post and HN discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22146291 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | throw0101b 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
> You're not handling sensitive data, so unencrypted is just fine. Except when an adversary MITMs your site and injects an attack to one of your readers: * https://www.infoworld.com/article/2188091/uk-spy-agency-uses... Further: tapping glass is a thing, and if the only traffic that is encrypted is the "important" or "sensitive" stuff, then it sticks out in the flow, and so attackers know to focus just on that. If all traffic is encrypted, then it's much harder for attackers to figure out what is important and what is not. So by encrypting your "unimportant" data you add more noise that has to be sifted through. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
[deleted] |