AGI is not enough. Seriously, imagine if they had an AGI in their ChatGPT interface. It’s not enough to do anything truly meaningful. It’s like a genius in the woods somewhere. For AGI to have an impact it needs to be everywhere.

> Seriously, imagine if they had an AGI in their ChatGPT interface. It’s not enough to do anything truly meaningful

If they had that people would make agents with it and then it can do tons of truly meaningful things.

People try to make agents with the current one but its really difficult since its not AGI.

Once AGI is accomplished I can’t imagine what else it would do but bootstrap itself up which, depending on compute, could scale quite far. OpenAI would only need to feed it compute for the most part.

I don’t think AGI is close, but once it happens it’s hard to imagine it not “escaping” (whenever we want to define that as).

Robotics to navigate the physical world seems more impactful than some pin/glasses product to provide a passive audio/visual interface to the chatbot doesn't seem so earth shattering either though.

What would you do with a 10x or 100x smarter Siri/Alexa? I still don't see my life changing.

Give me a robot that can legitimately do household errands like the dishes, laundry, etc.. now we are talking.