▲ | internet_points 12 hours ago | |||||||||||||
does that number take into account the area of nature paved to create roads for transporting those huge masts? | ||||||||||||||
▲ | os2warpman 12 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||
Because they require so little, infrequent, maintenance it makes very little sense to pave asphalt roads to wind tower locations. For the vast majority of wind farms, dirt or gravel roads connect masts to pre-existing infrastructure. The largest wind farm in the US is the Alta Wind Energy Center: https://maps.app.goo.gl/rPjUGSTN979dfUoDA The largest wind farm in Europe is the Markbygden Wind Farm: https://maps.app.goo.gl/ETVeMXpf1uPieTct8 Dirt and gravel roads. I'm not saying that there have never been roads paved to create wind farms. I am saying that the number of roads that have paved is so small that it is irrelevant. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
▲ | bluGill 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||
Why should it? We already have all those roads as they were built for all our other transport needs and have plenty of spare capacity for the few wind turbines (1 every 5 minutes is not much use on a modern road) we are building. Unless you are talking about the last 100 meters - but as the other reply pointed out, those are not roads. Most of the ones I've seen are grass - the roads are used so little we don't need gravel and they don't even turn into dirt. |