Remix clone Hacker News

new | show | ask | jobs Github

▲

belter 14 hours ago

Surely someone can articulate the flaw...Unless, of course, there isn’t one worth mentioning....

▲

cbg0 14 hours ago | parent [-]

They're deployed on Azure and have a deep partnership with Microsoft, so they can't "simply" use a different cloud.

Also, recommending a black box managed solution isn't an option for some large companies that have their own hardware & datacenters and which may want to use open source solutions they can easily deploy, fork and support themselves to keep costs under control.

▲

belter 13 hours ago | parent [-]

They are one of the most well capitalized company/startup/foundation/non-profit in the planet and just spent 6,5 billion to hire a designer.

They should be using the best technical and cheapest solution, and they owe it to their investors. At their scale they will never be able to use anything else than a cloud solution.

They could solve these issues at the number of users they report, for a monthly bill below 25 million dollars.

"6,311 database instances running the PostgreSQL-compatible and MySQL-compatible editions of Amazon Aurora processed more than 376 billion transactions, stored 2,978 terabytes of data, and transferred 913 terabytes of data" - https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/how-aws-powered-prime-day-2...

	▲	CharlesW 9 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		> At their scale they will never be able to use anything else than a cloud solution. That's definitely not true, and there are many companies doing higher volumes at a fraction of the cost-per-query. Although scale doesn't force companies into public-cloud database systems, considerations like capital, time-to-market, and business strategy often do. In this case, OpenAI is trading a significantly higher per-query cost for benefits like improved agility, turnkey compliance, etc.
	▲	iampims 13 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		but that'd be real money, not the Monopoly money they used to buy Ive/Windsurf...