| ▲ | xnickb 9 hours ago |
| What do you base your certainty on? Were there any significant enough breakthroughs in the AGI? |
|
| ▲ | scotty79 9 hours ago | parent [-] |
| ARC-AGI, while imagined as super hard for AI, was beaten enough that they had to come up with ARC-AGI-2. |
| |
| ▲ | hbsbsbsndk 9 hours ago | parent [-] | | "AI tend to be brittle and optimized for specific tasks, so we made a new specific task and then someone optimized for it" isn't some kind of gotcha. Once ARC puzzles became a benchmark they ceased to be meaningful WRT "AGI". | | |
| ▲ | scotty79 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | So if DOTA became a benchmark same way Chess or Go became earlier it would be promptly beaten. It just didn't stick before people moved to more useful "games". |
|
|
