> What's the value of saying you were blocked but now you aren't?

Going in to huge detail about it, not much, really.

A quick "hey, hit an issue yesterday with ABC, Kris helped me out - thanks Kris!" does a few things.

It reminds everyone we all might need to ask for help now and then.

Gives a bit of public recognition to Kris who might not otherwise get it.

Also lets people know Kris (and now you) know a bit more about issue ABC in case they might have a similar issue.

When I hit weird snags, they're not always things I'd detail out in a ticket, especially if unrelated to the specifics of the ticket. "Add links to help documents" as a ticket doesn't benefit much from me documenting out that I hit some weird issue because the security team didn't add accounts to a new policy group, meaning my emails to the accounting team were bouncing. "Kris confirmed it was an issue for her as well, and reached out to Kevin's group to let him know, and we got things resolved yesterday". Yeah, you could add that to a ticket, but feels useful to mention that in a status meeting. Larger discussion about the process behind those changes or scheduling impact should be taken offline outside the meeting.

"...should be set to Blocked..." do you do that the moment you aren't making forward progress on something? It's something I wouldn't typically do until after some amount of time understanding why I wasn't making progress, and trying to 'unblock' things first within a short period. Days of unblocking attempts without raising a flag are generally not good, but 3 minutes of 'being stuck' before pinging others is also not great imo.