Why is it that only you say this, everytime the same user handle, cherry-picking things out of context.

The part that you quote, is understood clearly that: for a company to do a thing (develop a programming language, for free), that thing need to tie back to their bottom line somehow.

That is not the same as "in order to sell more IDE licences, we need to create a programming language". That is such a roundabout way to think, why not just make more IDE variants for the uncovered languages, and not have to deal with promoting this entire new thing?

> an adoption problem outside Android

At this very moment I am working on a product with a kotlin back-end and flutter front-end.