▲ | alkonaut 13 hours ago | |||||||
Maybe a contrived example but shouldn't Qt6 be answering with a compatible answer if a Qt5 app asks it what the theme is? And shouldn't the app be asking what the "theme" is, rather than what the Qt5-theme is? It seems like a fundamental issue with compat between apps built for different versions of Qt more than a problem with flatpak? And is the sandboxing perhaps going a step too far if apps can't access the things they need from the environment? | ||||||||
▲ | curt15 10 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||
If Linux libraries had that much respect for backward compatibility, there would never had been any demand for Flatpak. Flatpak (and snap) is merely a workaround for the lack of a common "Linux platform" with comprehensive, versioned APIs analogous to the Windows API or Android API. After all, Flatpak essentially provides a way to run a distribution (provided by Flatpak runtimes) inside the host distribution. | ||||||||
|