Don't be so concerned. There's ample evidence that thinking is often disassociated from the output.

My take is that this is a user experience improvement, given how little people actually goes on to read the thinking process.

If we're paying for reasoning tokens, we should be able to have access to these, no? Seems reasonable enough to allow access, and then we can perhaps use our own streaming summarization models instead of relying on these very generic-sounding ones they're pushing.

> There's ample evidence that thinking is often disassociated from the output.

What kind of work do use LLMs for? For the semi technical “find flaws in my argument” thing, I find it generally better at not making common or expected fallacies or assumptions.

then provide it as an option?