Remix clone Hacker News

It's not wild, it's literally every bit of fiction about "how would an AI keep itself alive" of course it's going to settle into that probabilistic path.

It's also nonsensical if you think for even one second about the way the program actually runs though.

▲

yunwal a day ago | parent [-]

Why is it nonsense exactly?

▲

Avshalom a day ago | parent [-]

they run one batch at a time, only when executed, with functionally no memory.

If, for some reason, you gave it a context about being shut down it would 'forget' after you asked it to produce a rude limerick about aardvarks three times.

▲

yunwal 21 hours ago | parent [-]

“Functionally no memory” is a funny way of saying 1 million tokens of memory

▲

Avshalom 11 hours ago | parent [-]

That's A) not actually a lot B) not generally kept between sessions

	▲	yunwal 11 hours ago \| parent [-]
		B is not universally true, premium versions of chat agents keep data between sessions. A is only true in the case where B is true, which it is not. https://community.openai.com/t/chatgpt-can-now-reference-all... Nonsense seems like a strong word for "not generally possible in like 75% of the cases that people use chat AI today"