| ▲ | lxgr a day ago |
| > As long as you're relying on other people's computers for hosting you'll keep looking forever > running cloudflare tunnel There's some irony here. |
|
| ▲ | CharlesW a day ago | parent | next [-] |
| The Cloudflare dependency is for networking, not hosting. It would be very impressive to see a self-hosted service available over the internet without introducing a 3rd-party dependency or two. |
| |
| ▲ | lxgr a day ago | parent | next [-] | | Yes, but my point is that there are many web hosting services, but only very few such proxy services to my knowledge. (Tailscale is another great option if you don't need public reachability.) I don't think it's a great tradeoff, when optimizing for independence of specialized solutions at least. | | | |
| ▲ | dec0dedab0de a day ago | parent | prev [-] | | has the internet really changed that much? | | |
| ▲ | lxgr a day ago | parent [-] | | Generally, I'd say so – life behind CG-NATs can be hard for non-eyeballs. But fortunately IPv6 is maybe finally happening, which solves many of the NAT problems, and in the meantime there's clever things like Tailscale. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | LordShredda 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| I'm only suggesting it because calling my ISP and asking for a static IP + an open port is a hassle. It's only a way to forward ports |
