▲ | systems 2 days ago | |||||||
i love emacs, but nowadays i would argue most languages are far better supported outside emacs, with few exception like lisps so being strictly emacs, will really limit your choices, and honestly waste your time | ||||||||
▲ | matthew-craig a day ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
I currently rock a setup, as a Java dev, where I do as much as I can in emacs but have a binding to jump to the current line in Intellij. I find myself switching between the 2 without too much friction. It's mostly just committing in Intellij and having pre-commit checks analyze my changes. | ||||||||
▲ | -__---____-ZXyw 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
What do you love about emacs, if I may ask? Bit hard to guess what you could mean, given your subsequent claims there. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
▲ | beepbooptheory a day ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Perhaps its better to say there is very little "out of the box" wrt language support, but otherwise I am not quite sure what you mean for >90% of situations. Eglot + the right lsp server gets you really far these days. |