| ▲ | macleginn 7 months ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
A spelling error, using one dictionary definition, is "an error in the conventionally accepted form of spelling a word" --- mistaking one word for another does not fall under this definition. It is true that we now expect spell checkers to do grammatical checking as well, but a pure spell checker can indeed rely on a wordlist for English (this wouldn't work in languages with more developed morphology and/or frequent compounding). | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | kmacdough 7 months ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Ok, but this is a technicality. Spell-checkers have slowly evolved into grammar checkers and what people really want is error correction. Whether people call it a spell checker a minor language issue (and the kind of things humans do all the time). When teaching for your dictionary, ask: "is it obvious what they mean if I'm not being pedantic?" | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | tacitusarc 7 months ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
I don’t think I agree with your interpretation of the definition. If I spell the word “pale” as “pal”, that is not an acceptable spelling for the word “pale”, even if it is coincidentally the acceptable spelling for an entirely different word. If I asked a human editor to spellcheck the sentence: “His mouth dropped and he turned pal.”, the editor would correctly indicate I had misspelled the word. Spellcheck hasn’t done this in the past because it can be quite difficult. But that’s a limitation of computer capability, not functionality bounded by the definition of the term “spellcheck”. | |||||||||||||||||||||||