▲ | erdosjr 3 days ago | |
There is a small mistake in the formula: the actual cardinality of the noise database would be 16777216 ^ (1024 * 768), which is a much bigger number. | ||
▲ | carlnewton 3 days ago | parent [-] | |
Ah yes, the way I was thinking of it, I was only considering the variations of one pixel in each position of the image, not combined. Thanks! |