| ▲ | constantcrying 12 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
>but a fix is to propose research to a journal before conducting it and being committed to publication regardless of outcome. Does not fix the underlying issue. Having a "this does not work" paper on your resume will do little for your career. So the incentives to make data fit a positive hypothesis are still there. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | sightbroke 9 hours ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
That is categorically not true. Showing why something does not work (or is not advantageous over other methods) demonstrates you know how to properly conduct research which is good for ones resume. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||