| ▲ | robocat 8 months ago | ||||||||||||||||
The context is about when cars reach the poor - your example of someone spending $60k is irrelevant. A poorer person in NZ spends at most a few thousand on their car. The original retail price is nearly irrelevant by the time it gets to someone poorish (however maintenance/parts costs do matter for old cars). The financial benefit of a discount mostly goes to the people that own the car while it depreciates as it trickles down. Context: In New Zealand, the vast majority of people drive second hand cars (mostly imported second hand from Japan). A 20 year old car is regarded as newish in New Zealand. I am well off, so I have two second hand cars, my daily driver is 2006 I think, and I have a 1996 4WD for other stuff. New cars are only bought by the well off. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | otterley 8 months ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||
I hear you. The numbers I provided were manufactured to illustrate the math and support my argument, not to be representative of a typical price. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||