▲ | rollcat 7 hours ago | |||||||
This. Simple projects: just use plain C. This is dwm, the window manager that spawned a thousand forks. No ./configure in sight: <https://git.suckless.org/dwm/files.html> If you run into platform-specific stuff, just write a ./configure in simple and plain shell: <https://git.suckless.org/utmp/file/configure.html>. Even if you keep adding more stuff, it shouldn't take more than 100ms. If you're doing something really complex (like say, writing a compiler), take the approach from Plan 9 / Go. Make a conditionally included header file that takes care of platform differences for you. Check the $GOARCH/u.h files here: <https://go.googlesource.com/go/+/refs/heads/release-branch.g...> (There are also some simple OS-specific checks: <https://go.googlesource.com/go/+/refs/heads/release-branch.g...>) This is the reference Go compiler; it can target any platform, from any host (modulo CGO); later versions are also self-hosting and reproducible. | ||||||||
▲ | knorker 3 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||
Interesting that you would bring up Go. Go is probably the most head-desk language of all for writing portable code. Go will fight you the whole way. Even plain C is easier. You can have a whole file be for OpenBSD, to work around that some standard library parts have different types on different platforms. So now you need one file for all platforms and architectures where Timeval.Usec is int32, and another file for where it is int64. And you need to enumerate in your code all GOOS/GOARCH combinations that Go supports or will ever support. You need a file for Linux 32 bit ARM (int32/int32 bit), one for Linux 64 bit ARM (int64,int64), one for OpenBSD 32 bit ARM (int64/int32), etc…. Maybe you can group them, but this is just one difference, so in the end you'll have to do one file per combination of OS and Arch. And all you wanted was pluggable "what's a Timeval?". Something that all build systems solved a long time ago. And then maybe the next release of OpenBSD they've changed it, so now you cannot use Go's way to write portable code at all. So between autotools, cmake, and the Go method, the Go method is by far the worst option for writing portable code. | ||||||||
|