I don't want to contribute to this giant propaganda machine by making it more valuable. Structural problems must be fixed first.

"If your solution consists of 'everyone should just X', you don't have a solution"

▲

tim333 8 months ago | parent | next [-]

People say "propaganda machine" but I have yet to see much example of that. The Trumpists don't like it because it fact checks their lies but I'm not sure it's fair to call that propaganda? Any examples like a link to an article or section that you feel is propaganda?

	▲	moritzwarhier 8 months ago \| parent [-]
		Many people here decry Wikipedia as biased, impossible to edit and other bad things. But none of the comments point out the actual article that they wanted to edit. Ironically, presumably to remain anonymous. Anonymity and pseudonymity are directly attacked in the letter this article is about. Wikipedia sure isn't perfect, but so far, when commenters attack it with fundamental vitriol, I've always found these people to have a political agenda.

▲

sokoloff 8 months ago | parent | prev [-]