▲ | Der_Einzige 15 hours ago | |
You can just ignore the license since the existence of these models is based on piracy at a scale never before seen. Aaron Swartz couldn’t have even imagined violating copyright that hard. If you live in a glass house, you won’t throw stones. No one in the LLM space wants to be litigious It’s an open secret that DeepSeek used a ton of OpenAI continuations both in pre training and in the distillation. That totally violates openAI TOS. No one cares. | ||
▲ | LoganDark 14 hours ago | parent [-] | |
> No one in the LLM space wants to be litigious Except for OpenAI. |