| ▲ | tw04 19 hours ago | |||||||||||||
>Trucks in particular are protected by the notorious 25% "chicken tax", which has been in place since the 1960s. And yet, that applies to everyone, including US automakers, which is why Ford had to do unnatural things to import the transit from Europe. They aren't protecting US automakers, they're trying to retain some semblance of manufacturing in the US, which I'm fully in support of. Both because those are well-paying jobs and because it's a matter of national security. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | warkdarrior 17 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||
> they're trying to retain some semblance of manufacturing in the US, which I'm fully in support of. > > Both because those are well-paying jobs and because it's a matter of national security. Why should manufacturing jobs be well-paying? Human productivity has not kept up with business improvements at all. A contemporary robot can assemble car modules much faster than a robot from, say, the 60s. A human now works at the same speed as a human from the 60s. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | mulmen 18 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||
> They aren't protecting US automakers, they're trying to retain some semblance of manufacturing in the US, which I'm fully in support of. "The US can't make anything" is an absurd delusion. We are the second most productive economy in the world. > Both because those are well-paying jobs and because it's a matter of national security. We are fully capable of meeting our defense needs already. If you really care about reinforcing our military-industrial capability the best way to do it is to arm Ukraine. | ||||||||||||||