▲ | idiotsecant 21 hours ago | |
Incomplete combustion is a big component of emissions, and it's exactly what you're saying doesn't exist | ||
▲ | CorrectHorseBat 20 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
Yes but since incomplete combustion is inverse correlated with fuel efficiency (unburned fuel is wasted fuel), it's not really a trade off. What is a trade off is NO emissions vs fuel efficiency. Burning your fuel oxygen rich will burn of more fuel, but also makes more NO (due to higher temperatures if I remember correctly). | ||
▲ | cma 20 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Those eventually degrade to CO2 so the increased warming from them compared to co2 by mass is temporary, like with methane. |