▲ | brigandish a day ago | |
From [1]: > Data from the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), obtained by The Telegraph under a Freedom of Information request, reveals that 292 people have been charged with communications offences under the new regime. This includes 23 prosecutions for sending a “false communication”… > The offence replaces a lesser-known provision in the Communications Act 2003, Section 127(2), which criminalised “false messages” that caused “needless anxiety”. Unlike its predecessor, however, the new offence carries a potential prison sentence of up to 51 weeks, a fine, or both – a significant increase on the previous six-month maximum sentence.… > In one high-profile case, Dimitrie Stoica was jailed for three months for falsely claiming in a TikTok livestream that he was “running for his life” from rioters in Derby. Stoica, who had 700 followers, later admitted his claim was a joke, but was convicted under the Act and fined £154. [1] https://freespeechunion.org/hundreds-charged-with-online-spe... | ||
▲ | otterley a day ago | parent [-] | |
Knowingly and intentionally sending false information or harassing people doesn't seem like the same thing as merely "speaking your mind." |