Remix clone Hacker News

Yup. Were a database company that needs to be compliant with SOC2, and I’ve had extremely long and tiring arguments with our auditor why we couldn’t adhere to some of these standard WAF rulesets because it broke our site (we allow people to spin up a demo env and trigger queries).

We changed auditors after that.

▲

spydum a day ago | parent [-]

sounds like your security policy is wrong (or doesnt have a provision for exceptions managed by someone with authority to grant them), or your auditor was swerving out of his lane. As far as I've seen: SOC2 doesn't describe any hard security controls - it just asks to evaluate your policy versus your implemented controls.

	▲	stingraycharles 14 hours ago \| parent [-]
		You are absolutely correct, which is why we switched auditors. We use a third party to verify compliance of all our cloud resources (SecureFrame), and one of their checks is that specific AWS WAF rulesets are enabled on e.g. CloudFront endpoints. These are managed rulesets by AWS. We disabled this check, auditor swerved out of his lane, I spent more several hours explaining things he didn’t understand, and things resolved after our CEO had a call with him (you can imagine how the discussion went). All in all, if the auditor would have been more reasonable it wouldn’t have been an issue, but I’ve always been wary of managed firewall rulesets because of this reason.