| ▲ | ndsipa_pomu 8 months ago | |||||||
It's merely security theater. It reminds me of when airports started scanning people's shoes because an attacker had used a shoe bomb. Yes, that'll stop an attacker trying a shoe bomb again, but it disadvantages every traveller and attackers know to put explosives elsewhere. | ||||||||
| ▲ | geoffpado 8 months ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
“attacker had used a shoe bomb” It’s even dumber than that. An attacker tried and failed to use a shoe bomb, and yet his failure has caused untold hours of useless delay for over 13 years now. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | eli 8 months ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Most ransomware attacks are opportunistic. They scan basically the whole internet for vulnerabilities and attack from there. It's usually not a skilled attacker targeting a specific company. Ransomware is a huge and growing problem. Very different than airline security, where attacks are extremely uncommon. If planes were constantly getting blown up, and if a majority of those attacks started with a shoe bomb, then checking everyone's shoes would seem a lot more reasonable, no? | ||||||||