Remix.run Logo
alex_duf 9 hours ago

Have you tried claude?

https://claude.ai/public/artifacts/9c2d8d0c-0410-4971-a19a-f...

node script.js --name=John --age 30 -v

Parsed options: { name: 'John', age: 30, verbose: true, help: false }

Positional arguments: []

node script.js --name=Alex --age 40 -v

Parsed options: { name: 'Alex', age: 40, verbose: true, help: false }

Positional arguments: []

sebstefan 9 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I keep seeing that `args = process.argv.slice(2)` line to skip past `node script.js`

I ended up settling for it as well (I couldn't find anything better, nor make it break) but I'd be really surprised if it was the way to go

Like `node --enable-tracing script.js --name=John --age 30 --verbose`

This works because node seems to hide --enable-tracing to the underlying script

But would it work with Bun & Deno...? Is that standard...?

sebstefan 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

This one seems way better

It didn't account for the presence of a '--' to end the parsing of named arguments but that's it

echoangle 8 hours ago | parent [-]

> It didn't account for the presence of a '--' to end the parsing of named arguments but that's it

That’s just something getopt does and some programs adopted. If you asked me to write a parser, I wouldn’t necessarily include that either if you didn’t ask for it.

sebstefan 7 hours ago | parent [-]

If you don't include it you can't have positional arguments that look like options

Some positional arguments can be filenames, filenames can be --help and --verbose or --name=Frank

You have to have `--` or something similar to have a correct program

echoangle 6 hours ago | parent [-]

> You have to have `--` or something similar to have a correct program

No, only if the positional arguments need to support arbitrary strings. If you have something like a package manager and the first positional argument is the subcommand and everything after is an alphanumeric package name, you don’t need to support the double dash.

sebstefan 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

But also like as a matter of principle it's annoying when you're working on a big codebase, and you have weird, hidden, silently explosive unwritten contracts between random components

Package managers is an especially bad example because github projects typically are github.com/author-name/words-separated-by-dashes

So you will probably have somebody along the way pester you about allowing dashes between words, to play nice with github

But who's to know if the guy making that change will think of disallowing dashes at the start of the words? Likely he'll just add \- to /[A-Z\-]+/

Suddenly the script you wrote starts getting passed positional arguments that have dashes in them, until some wise guy tries to create a package called `--verbose`, then notices unintended effects on your pages, goes ahead trying `--verbose -- react`, ...

So anyway -- if I'm making a heavily reusable piece of code like this I make it as general purpose as possible in a way that makes it impossible to mis-use it

sebstefan 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

You don't know what it's going to be used for when you get that prompt. Not handling arbitrary strings is a bug