| ▲ | bee_rider 12 hours ago |
| That would be nice, but I think it is just a licensing issue and the companies that hold the licenses don’t have any incentive to try and simplify things—they’d prefer we subscribe to every service and then watch, like, one show on each. |
|
| ▲ | bjelkeman-again 10 hours ago | parent [-] |
| It would be interesting to see data on this. How many people subscribe to multiple streaming services, vs the opportunity to license the content to an aggregator and sell to those that miss a lot of content because, like me they don’t want multiple services. I refuse to subscribe to all the services that have the content I want to watch: Netflix, Apple, Prime, HBO Max, Discovery… the high seas become an inconvenient option at this point. |
| |
| ▲ | andreasmetsala 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > vs the opportunity to license the content to an aggregator Isn’t this what Netflix used to be | | |
| ▲ | sgerenser 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Exactly. And the whole reason all these other services popped up is the IP holders realized they could make a lot more money with their own service vs licensing to an aggregator. I think it worked out pretty well for Disney+, because they have a huge back catalog of very popular IP. Not sure if anyone else is really making money with this new model, but they still don’t want to go back to ceding all control to Netflix. |
| |
| ▲ | bee_rider 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I agree (and would also like to see that sort of info if it existed). But, I’m pretty sure the same folks who were in charge of cable when it became insufferable are now in charge of streaming. So, less-annoying business models… I’m not hopeful. |
|
