▲ | tibbar 17 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A reference to Larry Ellison as a lawnmower, perhaps? [0] > Do not fall into the trap of anthropomorphising Larry Ellison. You need to think of Larry Ellison the way you think of a lawnmower. You don't anthropomorphize your lawnmower, the lawnmower just mows the lawn, you stick your hand in there and it'll chop it off, the end. You don't think 'oh, the lawnmower hates me' -- lawnmower doesn't give a shit about you, lawnmower can't hate you. Don't anthropomorphize the lawnmower. Don't fall into that trap about Oracle. — Brian Cantrill (https://youtu.be/-zRN7XLCRhc?t=33m1s) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | edmundsauto 15 hours ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Generally this is relevant advice for thinking about important people. We know little about them, almost all of it is projection that reflects more of my perspective than any reality of the object’s psychology. Humans love to think we know why someone behaves the way they do. We love to diagnose disorders in strangers based on a very very tiny bit of information. It is best to treat the decisions as black boxes, or else we are just projecting. I think it’s called the fundamental attribution bias? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|