| ▲ | thegeomaster 18 hours ago | |
Well, there's also gemini-2.0-flash-exp-image-generation. Also autoregressive/transfusion based. | ||
| ▲ | thefourthchime 18 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
Such a good name.... | ||
| ▲ | Yiling-J 14 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
gemini-2.0-flash-exp-image-generation doesn’t perform as well as GPT-4o's image generation, as mentioned in section 5.1 of this paper: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2504.02782. However based on my test, for certain types of images such as realistic recipe images, the results are quite good. You can see some examples here: https://github.com/Yiling-J/tablepilot/tree/main/examples/10... | ||
| ▲ | raincole 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
It's quite bad now, but I have no doubt that Google will catch up. The AI field looks awfully like {OpenAI, Google, The Irrelevent}. | ||
| ▲ | yousif_123123 17 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
It's also good but clearly not close still. Maybe Gemini 2.5 or 3 will have better image gen. | ||
| ▲ | swyx 13 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
> transfusion based. what is that? | ||