The surgeon could be the cousin's mom or dad. The cousin's dad didn't die in the crash, his cousin did. The question "how is this possible?" implies there is some sort of contradiction when there isn't any at all. It has nothing to do with sexism, and to say it does reflects a bias in the reader causing them to "spidey sense" a cultural bugaboo when it's utterly irrelevant in this scenario.

▲

harrall 8 months ago | parent [-]

Can someone explain to me how I read it wrong?

I read it as 2 cousins are in an accident and 1 of the cousins is the son of the surgeon.

What was the contradictory statement that I missed?

	▲	sebastialonso 8 months ago \| parent \| next [-]
		You read it right. There's no contradiction. The famous original bit started with "a man and his son". This bit is certainly part of the LLM's training corpus, so it's expected to acknowledg it when you mention it. The thing is, you didn't mention that bit to the LLM. You mentioned a completely different scenario, basically two persons who happen to be cousins. But you used the same style when presenting it. The issue is not a hidden contradiction or a riddle, the issue is that the LLM completely ignored the logical consequences of the scenario you presented. It's like asking it about the name of the brave greek hero in the battle where the famous Trojan Cow was present. If you get "Achilles" is obviously wrong, there was never a Trojan Cow to begin with!
	▲	judahmeek 8 months ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		There isn't a contradiction. Making the LLM look for a nonexistent contradiction is the point of this prompt.