▲ | division_by_0 a day ago | |||||||
Ok, I see your point. I wrote in another thread that I loved the simplicity of using $: for deriveds and effects in Svelte 3 and 4. And yes, the conciseness and magic were definitely part of it. You could just move so fast with it. Getting better performance with the new reactivity system is important to my data viz work, so it helped me to accept the other changes in Svelte 5. | ||||||||
▲ | omneity 21 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||
Exactly. There was a certain simplicity that might be lost. But yeah I can imagine it might work out differently for others as well. Glad to hear it is for you! Have you considered other options? Curious if you came across anything particularly interesting from the simplicity or DX angle. | ||||||||
|