Remix clone Hacker News

I also find this annoying, but it‘s common practice to do this while a draft is still being worked on and not yet getting submitted to a journal (SSRN is ≈ SocSci Arxiv)

▲

tough a day ago | parent [-]

Why isn't there a global-like open platform for science like ArXiv?

▲

bschne 21 hours ago | parent [-]

path dependency with fields having developed their own early on I guess?

▲

tough 21 hours ago | parent [-]

so are these like other fields don't use LaTeX but other formatting?

I can see for example if its' mostly word documents from source on that area of science maybe there's no point on arxiv like pipeline that builds from source.

wondering if it will ever converge there, like a wikipedia only about science/research but of all areas

	▲	pmyteh 10 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Some of it is formatting, some of it is just field dependent. SSRN is commercial and "good enough" for many people. It (at least used to) advertise itself as a social network for social science academics. There's also SocArXiv[0] and others, which are purer extensions of the arxiv model. Part of the issue is that the arxiv doesn't want every discipline in science, so a certain amount of duplication is necessary. [0]: https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv