| ▲ | Kalabasa a day ago | |
I think this was what Google Plus was going for. Instead of friend graphs (mutual) or follower graphs (directed edges), they had Circles. Circles sound a lot like group chats. I guess "social circles" may be a better way to model social relationships than follower graphs. | ||
| ▲ | frollogaston a day ago | parent | next [-] | |
Circles was basically an ACL system, which isn't fun. Even if you do care exactly who you're sharing things with, it's not easy to tell with a Circle who that is. | ||
| ▲ | morkalork a day ago | parent | prev [-] | |
IMO it absolutely is the better way to model it. There's a reason that verbiage already existed in English. The other commenter is right though, there are the rare interaction between social circles that are lost but honestly I remember seeing just as many poor ones on FB back in the day as spontaneous positive ones. | ||