| ▲ | crmi a day ago |
| > After a few weeks of waiting, I eventually received the ‘African Daisy global forever vert pair’ stamp which was round! I should have noticed that the seller sent me the item using stamps at a much lower denomination that those I had ordered. Oh well. Wild that so many commenters don't see the satire dripping from the post.
Is it just a UK thing to never take things at face value? |
|
| ▲ | Scoundreller 19 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| I’m surprised this stamp seller didn’t cover half the envelope in 5 cent stamps. That’s what I usually get on the envelopes from stamp sellers: decades old stamps from the “bad investment” portions from stamp collectors. |
| |
| ▲ | changadera 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | I used to order fragrance samples on eBay, The first order I received from them had a 10 1/2 pence stamp attached. I was perplexed as the half pence (ha'penny, pronounced HAPE-KNEE) coin had been discontinued in 1984, 30 years ago at the time, and I'd only seen them in an old collection of coins from my parents. Also the portrait of the Queen (I'm from the UK) was a bit outdated. I contacted the seller and it turned out her husband was a stamp collector and gave her his low value cast-offs to use as postage. I found it amazing that 30+ year old stamps were still valid. It's only recently they've become invalid postage as now stamps require a barcode. Also I used to get items delivered to my office, and the office manager's husband was a stamp collector, so she used to ask to keep the stamps I got (I used to order electronic components from all over the world) so this completed the philatelist cycle. Another old currency anecdote. I used to work on the checkouts at a supermarket in Cambridge circa 2009 and at least two times we'd get visiting academics from the USA who had studied in the UK years before and they'd try to pay with currency they'd had from the time, except it was the awesome old pre-decimal money (We switched to decimal in 1971). I found it quaint that they thought it was still valid and thought to bring it with them. |
|
|
| ▲ | Luc a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I don't think that's satire. A wry observation perhaps. |
|
| ▲ | returningfory2 a day ago | parent | prev [-] |
| I don't understand the satire, can you explain? We can't see the full set of "lower denomination" stamps on the letter, but I'm not 100% sure it's actually lower denomination. The sender of the stamps seems to be using the "2 domestic forevers + some amount of cents = 1 global forever" formula. I think the UK sender didn't need to include _two_ global forevers. |
| |
| ▲ | returningfory2 a day ago | parent | next [-] | | Indeed, the formula is correct. Wikipedia maintains a list of historic Forever pricing: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_United_States_posta... From the blog, the letter from California was dated April 2022, at which point the rates were domestic = $0.58 and global = $1.30. So the California sender correctly attached two domestics valued at $1.16 total plus an additional $0.14 to make $1.30. | |
| ▲ | sudobash1 a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > I think the UK sender didn't need to include _two_ global forevers. It would be hard to know that ahead of time though. The global forever stamp is good for letters up to 1oz which can be as little as 4 US letter pages. It took the FSF 5 double-sided pages. Granted, it looks like lightweight paper & the post office doesn't seem to be very picky about this. But I think sending two forever stamps was being on the safe side. | | | |
| ▲ | crmi 19 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I think quoting that part alone, didn't make it clear I was referring to the whole article. >...... "Oh Well." May have been more apt. Is eBay really anyones first thought when looking for a (non-collector) stamp to (actually) mail? Perhaps he should have picked up a few £1 coins on eBay, use them to purchase some stamps from the post office?... | | |
| ▲ | unwind 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | But, again, he was in the UK buying US stamps, so that the FSF could mail their answer back to him from the US. I don't think UK post offices supply all the world's stamps, buying that online from individuals who have them for sale makes some kind of sense, doesn't it? I guess the a more "digital native" way would have been to first check if the USPS supports some kind of downloadable/printable stamping method, like QR codes or pre-bought labels (which, according to come early comment, they do). | |
| ▲ | Scoundreller 19 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | They needed US stamps. | | |
| ▲ | crmi 19 hours ago | parent [-] | | I didn't see any request for a return envelope or stamp. Author decided to include them (unless I missed something). | | |
| ▲ | xp84 17 hours ago | parent [-] | | It seems like common courtesy for me. Given the FSF are providing that service out of altruism, and are not the ones who neglected to give OP the license in the first place, it's only appropriate to not impose upon them to go buy stamps to send an international letter. | | |
| ▲ | crmi 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | What about the paper, ink, labour involved?
Why not slip $10 into envelope instead? | | |
| ▲ | db48x 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | De minimis. You only include the extra envelope so that you can write your own address on it. Postage is the only real expense. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
