Remix.run Logo
justin66 a day ago

Why is running doom one of your milestones, given that doom will run fine on bare metal?

UnmappedStack a day ago | parent | next [-]

That __is__ true, Doom can run on bare metal, but that's a fairly hacky solution in many ways. Doing it properly in userspace with a LibC and conceptually POSIX syscalls require a bit more effort. It requires a list of LibC functions and POSIX utilities as well as a few OS specific implementations.

justin66 20 hours ago | parent [-]

Very impressive work regardless. Keep it up :)

toast0 a day ago | parent | prev [-]

Doom is a fine milestone for an OS that intends to have graphical capabilities. Maybe Doom in text mode for other OSes :P

It's a known quantity, and doom has been ported to everything, so it shouldn't be too hard to make work either (he says, not having done it).

An OS that can run Doom is clearly capable of graphical interfaces with user interactivity, and maybe sound (although sound would be easy to leave out).

justin66 20 hours ago | parent [-]

Yeah, that's perfectly fair. I raised my question because it occurred to me this kind of sells the operating system short. In other words: even DOS could run Doom (with some help with a memory extender I guess, which is a technology we can all very happily not worry about anymore).

UnmappedStack 17 hours ago | parent [-]

I think the thing is, Doom was originally written __for__ DOS. Part of the cool part is porting 3rd party software to my OS that wasn't originally written for it. That was part of my reasoning at least.