▲ | alganet a day ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
So, software developers and writers can be replaced by a machine but venture capitalists can't? It doesn't make sense. AI should be even better at replacing those. Why does an AI need money for? It would spend it more responsibly than a human VC would. Think of it as a guide. As the VC in charge lends his money and network to the AI, it is training a tool that can help usher a new revolutionary era of investment full of a brand new generation of investors. If you are a VC, just try it. You might be surprised by the results and end up liking it. Who knows? AI is a friend! | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | alganet a day ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
You know what? Convincing these stubborn VCs would take a long time. We should just take their money, train the thing and show them how good AI can be. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | bluefirebrand a day ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
> software developers and writers can be replaced by a machine but venture capitalists can't Human Venture capitalists can in theory be held accountable for their actions, even if it does seem like they rarely actually are AI venture capitalists cannot be held accountable, so they should not be allowed to exist Accountability is important across all of human society AI's utter lack of accountability is not an accident, it is an appealing feature for immoral people who love the idea of laundering their own responsibility through a machine > If you are a VC, just try it. You might be surprised by the results and end up liking it. Who knows? AI is a friend I am not a VC, and AI is not a friend | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|