▲ | spinytree21 2 days ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> And of course there was no famine in the USSR in the late 80s. I'm curious on what you base this information on. Having lived that period and experiencing first hand the shortages, I can say the opposite. > In the USSR most reformists or people who achieved real power after the collapse were opportunistic party insiders who were at the right place at the right time That is generally what happens with revolutions. In some places it got better though. Not all ex-USSR ended up like belarus or russia. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | wqaatwt a day ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> I can say the opposite You mean your are aware of an actual famine in the UUSR in the late 80s? > Not all ex-USSR ended up like belarus or russia None besides the Baltic states did well though (and they are somewhat special due to historical and diplomatic reasons). All other states are generally very poor and extremely corrupt (even those that have m have lots of oil like Azerbaijan). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|