▲ | alganet 2 days ago | ||||||||||||||||
Using aimbot in Gunbound didn't make players better. Yes, it changed everything: it destroyed the game ecosystem. Can humanity use "literacy aimbot" responsibly? I don't know. It's just a cautionary tale. I'm not expecting to win an argument. I could come up with counter anectdotes myself: ABS made breaking in slippery conditions easier and safer. People didn't learned to brake better, they still pushed the pedal harder thinking it would make it stop faster, not realizing the complex dynamics of "making a car stop". That changed everything. It made cars safer. Also, just an anecdote. Sure, a lot of people need focus. Some people don't, they need to branch out. Some systems need aimbot (like ABS), some don't (like Gunbound). The future should be home to all kinds of skills. | |||||||||||||||||
▲ | cadamsdotcom 2 days ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Appreciate the balanced take. An improvement to a technology can be good, or it can be harmful - and beyond a certain point, further amplification can destroy society and the commons which we all benefit from. Coca leaves are a relatively benign part of daily life in Peru & a few other surrounding countries - they’re on the table in your hotel lobby, ready to be stirred into your tea. But cocaine - same base but made more intense with technology - causes many problems - and don’t even start about crack cocaine. So when thinking of technology through the lens of what it amplifies we can consider traditional Internet research & writing contrasted vs. using AI - the latter gives instant answers and often an instant first draft. Great for some; harmful for others. Where that point lies and what factors contribute is different for every individual. | |||||||||||||||||
|