| ▲ | troupo a day ago | ||||||||||||||||
> You would rather read all of <law> than pipe it into an LLM to answer a few questions about it? yes, yes I would. > How long would it take you to read that thing? I'm a reasonably fast reader and it would take me hours. For most of the "few questions" you can skim most of it > Are you a dedicated member of the "LLMs have no legitimate uses" camp? I'm in the camp of "do not offshore your thinking process to a non-deterministic black box whose whole mode operandi is to always generate plausible-looking answer and then profusely apologize if it was caught to produce invalid output". --- Also, "five hours to read an important legislation written in a surprisingly clear language is too long and nigh impossible" is the premier reason about so much bullshit disinformation about EU AI Act, DMA, GDPR and plethora of other, less important regulations | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | simonw a day ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||
I outsourced the "skim most of it" bit to the model. I used an LLM to jump to the bits that mattered, then I confirmed those bits by reading them myself in the original document (and thinking about them). LLMs are a tool. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||