▲ | aisenik 3 days ago | ||||||||||||||||
I did intend to type "Nazi era", though I find the clarification is meaningless to the point. I'm all for reclaiming words, but I am unaware of any significant efforts to reclaim and promote the word in question. It is anachronistic and inextricably connected to 20th century transphobia and violence against trans women in particular Re: your second point, a closer reading of the comments will show that this thread is discussing "women." e: The far more interesting discussion is whether the revival of eugenics-era language is justifiable. This is hardly the first example on this site of arrogant commentators casually reviving language that came to be understood as hateful in the 20th century. | |||||||||||||||||
▲ | ben_w 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
> I am unaware of any significant efforts to reclaim and promote the word in question. It is anachronistic and inextricably connected to 20th century transphobia and violence against trans women in particular It's the primary term I grew up with in the UK specifically about what is also called cross-dressing. It's also used by one of my favourite comedians, Suzy Eddie Izzard, as self-description ("executive transvestite") before she identified as transgender: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dress_to_Kill_(Eddie_Izzard) > Re: your second point, a closer reading of the comments will show that this thread is discussing "women." 1) Quite a lot of transphobes focus entirely on women, thus ignoring how their own rules end up forcing trans men to end up in women's-only spaces. 2) I am informed that many trans women have implants before hormones. In fact, one woman I know openly discussed face surgery as part of her transition. Also: cis women have breast surgery. I'm told most often as a reduction. Facebook, in its complete uselessness, has advertised the surgery to me along with dick pills. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
▲ | computerthings 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
[dead] |