>Where does one learn more about this concept?

One does not.

One builds the tools to run the experiments to discover the rules.

The closest are FinalSpark and CorticalLabs, but they both are only using in vitro neurons as the computational substrate.

Neuralink et al. are working in vivo, but they are only doing output and don't have any plans to do input, let alone to actively disrupt normal neural activity and take control of bodily processes.

If you're very interested feel free to drop me a line.

▲

fredjordan 8 months ago | parent [-]

I am one of the co-founder of FinalSpark, I believe biocomputing implies to master in vitro learning, and once you get there it may open new perspectives.

	▲	noosphr 8 months ago \| parent [-]
		On what time scales? Short term in vitro learning's been shown in the original CorticalLabs paper (20 min), but the sheer difficulty of keeping neurons alive, working, unstressed, fed and oxygenated in vitro while highly active for more than an hour at a time means that no one's been able to show how that short term learning transfers to long term memory. Using an organism that already provides all the life support for the neurons means that you can have test runs that last hours to weeks with continuous stimulation. Your tech is easily modifiable so it can do that since it's based on the Intan RHS chips. Happy to have a chat about it since you're one of the two companies that could potentially pull this off right now.