▲ | progbits 3 days ago | |
Unclear who revoked that but I think it likely was the reporter who discovered the bug. They only needed it issued & logged as evidence, and would be good practice to revoke immediately. | ||
▲ | mcpherrinm 3 days ago | parent [-] | |
The certificate remained unrevoked in OCSP until after SSL.com acknowledged the issue, so I don’t think the reporter was the one who had it revoked. It is also possible I was being served a stale/cached OCSP response. |